What Are e&m Codes (what are e&m codes) – A Practical Guide

Table of contents

Weekly newsletter

Join our community and never miss out on exciting opportunities. Sign up today to unlock a world of valuable content delivered right to your inbox.

Blog - Newsletter

Join the healthcare efficiency movement

Follow us for daily tips on:

If you’ve ever wondered how a doctor’s visit gets translated into a bill, the answer lies in a set of five-digit codes known as Evaluation and Management (E&M) codes. These aren't just random numbers; they're the universal language that tells the story of a patient encounter, dictating reimbursement and shaping the financial health of healthcare practices everywhere.

Think of an E&M code as the bridge between the clinical work you do and the reimbursement you receive. It communicates the complexity of a patient's problem, the depth of your clinical thinking, and the overall intensity of the visit to the insurance payer. Getting this translation right is not just administrative—it's a fundamental aspect of running a successful medical practice in today's intricate healthcare landscape.

The Foundation of Medical Billing

Two medical professionals discuss E&M codes, reviewing a document at a desk with a laptop.

Before E&M codes, the world of medical billing was a bit of a mess. Providers used their own descriptions for services, which created a ton of confusion for payers trying to figure out what they were paying for. There was no consistency, and billing was often a shot in the dark, leading to unpredictable payments and disputes. This lack of a common language made it nearly impossible to compare services or establish fair reimbursement rates across different regions or specialties.

The introduction of this standardized system brought much-needed order to the chaos. Now, a code for a complex new patient visit in a wound clinic in one state means the exact same thing as a similar visit in another. This uniformity is what allows for fair payment based on the actual cognitive work and effort a clinician puts in, creating a more equitable system for providers nationwide.

Why E&M Codes Are So Important

Getting a handle on what E&M codes are is absolutely critical to the financial health of any practice. When you code correctly, you get paid fairly for your time and expertise. Simple as that. It ensures that your revenue accurately reflects the complexity and intensity of the care you provide, which is vital for covering overhead, investing in new technologies, and ultimately, sustaining your practice.

But if you get it wrong, you’re opening the door to audits, claim denials, and a whole lot of lost revenue. This is especially true in a specialty like wound care, where patient visits are rarely straightforward and often require high-level medical decision-making. Inaccurate coding can lead to significant financial leakage, which can cripple a practice over time. Payers are increasingly using sophisticated software to flag coding anomalies, making accuracy more important than ever.

The real purpose of an E&M code is to translate the narrative of a patient encounter—the history, the exam, the thinking—into a single, universally understood format that payers can use to assign a value to your work.

Maintained by the American Medical Association (AMA) as part of the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code set, E&M codes range from 99202 to 99499. They allow providers to bill based on either the complexity of their Medical Decision Making (MDM) or the total time spent on the day of the encounter. This dual-path system offers flexibility, allowing clinicians to choose the metric that best represents the work performed during a specific visit.

The Basic Structure of E&M Codes

The E&M coding system is laid out logically, with different code families for different settings and patient types. This structure is designed to help you pinpoint the right code for any situation, from a routine office follow-up to a critical care consultation in the ICU. Understanding this framework is the first step toward confident and compliant coding.

Here’s how it’s generally broken down:

  • Place of Service: Where did the visit happen? The codes are different for an office, a hospital, a nursing facility, or a home visit. Each setting has its own unique set of codes and guidelines that reflect the resources and intensity of care provided there.
  • Patient Status: Is this a new patient (someone you haven't seen in the past three years) or an established patient? The codes and requirements vary significantly, as new patient visits typically involve a more comprehensive data gathering and assessment process.
  • Level of Service: Within each category, you’ll find different levels, usually from 1 to 5. A level 5 code represents the highest complexity and, naturally, comes with a higher reimbursement rate than a level 1 or 2. This leveling system is the core of E&M coding, ensuring that more intensive work receives greater compensation.

To help you keep these core concepts straight, here is a quick reference table.

Quick Guide to E&M Code Fundamentals

Concept Brief Explanation Why It Matters for Wound Care
Place of Service Identifies where the encounter occurred (e.g., outpatient clinic, hospital). Determines which set of codes to use. A wound care consultation in a hospital uses a different code than a follow-up in the office.
Patient Status Differentiates between new and established patients. New patient visits generally require more comprehensive documentation and have higher reimbursement rates.
Level of Service A numbered level (1-5) indicating the complexity of the visit. Correctly leveling the service is key to avoiding under-coding (lost revenue) or over-coding (audit risk).
Billing Component The basis for the code level, either Medical Decision Making (MDM) or Total Time. Wound care often involves high-complexity MDM, making it a common basis for coding, but time can also be used.

This table serves as a simple reminder of the building blocks. Mastering these fundamentals is the first step toward accurate and compliant coding, which protects your practice from audits and ensures financial stability.

At the end of the day, E&M codes are much more than just administrative hoops to jump through. They are the financial representation of your clinical expertise and the value you bring to your patients. They are the language that justifies your work in the eyes of payers and the healthcare system at large.

The Core Components of E&M Coding

Person working on a laptop with a checklist and clock icons on screen, and an alarm clock on the desk, with text 'MDM & TIME'.

To really get E&M coding right, you have to understand the two pillars it's built on: Medical Decision Making (MDM) and Time. Ever since the major guideline overhaul in 2021, these two factors are pretty much all that matter for leveling most outpatient E&M services. This change was designed to simplify the process and better reflect the cognitive effort involved in patient care.

Think of it like choosing how to ship a package. You could pay based on its complexity—how fragile it is, its awkward shape, or the special handling it requires. Or, you could just pay based on its weight, a simple, straightforward measurement. E&M coding works the same way. You can bill based on the complexity of your clinical thinking (MDM) or on the total time you spent on the patient's care that day.

The best part? You only have to meet the requirements for one of them. This gives you flexibility. A visit that's quick but requires intense mental gymnastics might get coded based on high-complexity MDM. On the other hand, a longer appointment filled with extensive patient counseling could easily be coded based on time. This choice allows you to select the path that most accurately captures the value of your service for each unique encounter.

Decoding Medical Decision Making (MDM)

MDM is the real heart and soul of E&M coding. It’s all about putting a value on the cognitive work—the thinking, the problem-solving, the planning—that goes into a patient visit. It’s not about the final diagnosis, but the entire journey you took to get there, including the differential diagnoses you considered and ruled out. MDM quantifies your clinical judgment.

The AMA breaks MDM down into four levels: straightforward, low, moderate, and high. To figure out which level a visit falls into, you have to look at three key elements.

  • Number and Complexity of Problems Addressed: This is about the patient's condition. Are you dealing with a minor, self-limiting problem? A stable chronic illness? Or is it an acute issue that poses a threat to life or limb? The severity and nature of the patient's problems are the starting point for assessing complexity.

  • Amount and/or Complexity of Data to Be Reviewed and Analyzed: This considers all the information you had to sift through. Did you review old records, order new tests, get an opinion from a specialist, or interpret imaging yourself? This element recognizes the effort involved in gathering and processing information to make an informed clinical decision.

  • Risk of Complications and/or Morbidity or Mortality of Patient Management: This element weighs the risk tied to the patient's condition and your treatment plan. You have to consider the potential for bad outcomes from the illness itself, the diagnostic tests you order, or the treatments you prescribe. This includes everything from medication side effects to surgical complications.

The rule of thumb is this: to hit a certain MDM level, you must meet the criteria for at least two of these three elements. This ensures the code reflects the overall complexity of the encounter, not just a single challenging part.

MDM in a Wound Care Scenario

Let’s bring this down to earth. Say an established patient with a diabetic foot ulcer comes in for a follow-up. But today, things are different. They report new signs of infection—more redness, swelling, and purulent drainage. They also have a fever.

This situation completely changes the MDM.

  • Problems Addressed: You're no longer managing a stable chronic wound. This has escalated to an acute, complicated injury, which immediately bumps up the complexity. This shift in problem status is a critical factor in determining a higher MDM level.
  • Data Reviewed: You'll need to check recent lab results (like a CBC and CRP), probably order a wound culture, and maybe even get an X-ray to rule out osteomyelitis. You're juggling multiple new pieces of data, which increases the data complexity element of MDM.
  • Risk: The risk level has jumped to moderate, maybe even high. This patient is at risk for sepsis, hospitalization, or surgical debridement. Your management plan—prescribing a new oral antibiotic and scheduling a close follow-up—carries its own set of risks, including potential allergic reactions or antibiotic resistance.

Because you addressed an acute, complicated problem and the management plan carries a moderate risk, this visit would almost certainly qualify for a moderate-to-high level of MDM (like CPT code 99214), even if you were only in the room for 15 minutes. This is a perfect example of how your clinical judgment directly drives the E&M code.

The Alternative Path: Time-Based Billing

Sometimes, the difficulty of a visit isn't in the diagnosis but in the sheer amount of time you spend with the patient and on their care. That's when billing based on time makes the most sense. This is particularly useful for visits that involve extensive counseling, care coordination, or patient education.

The guidelines are very clear about what counts toward your total time on the day of the visit. It’s not just face-to-face time; it includes a whole range of non-face-to-face activities you perform as the provider.

Activities Included in Total Time:

  • Prepping for the visit (e.g., reviewing recent labs or consult notes)
  • Obtaining or reviewing the patient's history
  • Performing a medically necessary exam
  • Counseling and educating the patient, their family, or a caregiver
  • Ordering medications, tests, or procedures
  • Communicating with other healthcare professionals about the patient's care (as long as it's not separately billed)
  • Documenting the visit in the EHR
  • Independently interpreting test results and sharing them with the patient
  • Coordinating care (when not billed separately)

If you're coding by time, solid documentation is non-negotiable. You need to record the total time spent and briefly describe what you did. A simple sentence in your note does the trick: "Total time spent today was 45 minutes, which included reviewing the patient's chart, counseling on new medication side effects, and coordinating care with their primary physician." This kind of clarity is your best friend if an audit ever comes knocking.

How Recent CPT Guideline Changes Affect Your Practice

Two medical professionals reviewing guidelines and documentation, one writing on a clipboard.

The world of E&M coding saw a major shake-up in 2021. The changes were designed with one big goal in mind: to cut down on the paperwork and administrative headaches, letting clinicians get back to focusing on their patients. This wasn't just a minor update; it fundamentally changed how outpatient services are documented and billed, marking the most significant shift in E&M coding in decades.

Getting a handle on these new rules is absolutely critical for any practice. For years, coding felt like a game of "bean counting." Clinicians were forced to document a certain number of historical details or physical exam bullet points just to justify a code. This led directly to "note bloat," where patient charts became clogged with repetitive, copy-pasted information that added very little to the actual story of the patient's care.

The new guidelines throw that old model out the window. They've moved the goalposts, putting your clinical thinking and decision-making front and center. The intent is to make the medical record a more useful clinical document rather than just a billing tool.

Shifting Focus to MDM and Time

The biggest change by far was the elimination of history and physical exam as the primary drivers for leveling an E&M code for office visits. While you still need to perform and document these for good patient care, you no longer have to count "bullet points" to support your code selection. This frees clinicians from the rigid, formulaic documentation requirements of the past.

Now, the E&M code level is determined by just one of two things:

  • The complexity of your Medical Decision Making (MDM)
  • The total time you spent on patient care activities on the day of the visit

This is a game-changer. It empowers you to document what's medically relevant, not just what an old formula demanded. As a wound care specialist, this means your note can zero in on the wound's status, the complexity of the treatment plan, and the patient's risk factors, rather than re-documenting their entire social history every single time they come in.

The heart of the 2021 E&M update is simple: your documentation should reflect how you think. It should tell the story of your medical decision-making, not just check off a list of required elements.

Of course, any big change comes with a learning curve. A 2023 study of outpatient clinics found that initial audits required changes to 47% of codes. Even after provider education, that number only dropped to 30%, representing a potential 19.2% loss in wRVUs if left uncorrected. To learn more about how practices are navigating these challenges, you can explore the ongoing impact of these E&M coding updates.

E&M Guideline Changes Pre-2021 vs. Post-2021

To really understand the impact, it helps to see a side-by-side comparison. The table below breaks down the key differences between the old way of coding and the new reality, specifically for a wound care setting.

The shift is clear: we've moved away from formulaic documentation and toward a system that values and rewards clinical judgment.

Coding Element Pre-2021 Requirement (The 'Old Way') Post-2021 Requirement (The 'New Way') Impact on Wound Care Documentation
History Required a specific number of HPI elements, ROS, and PFSH details to meet a certain code level. Document only what is medically appropriate and relevant for the visit. Less repetitive data entry. You can focus your documentation on interval changes in the wound or the patient's overall condition.
Physical Exam Required documenting a specific number of body systems or elements examined to justify the code. Perform and document a medically appropriate exam. No "bullet point" count is required for leveling. Notes can be more concise, detailing only the relevant wound assessment and other pertinent physical findings.
Code Selection Based on meeting 2 out of 3 components (History, Exam, MDM). Based solely on either MDM or the Total Time spent on the encounter date. This simplifies the code selection process, letting you choose the factor that best reflects the visit's true intensity and your work.

Ultimately, these changes give clinicians more flexibility to document what truly matters for patient care, making the medical record a more accurate reflection of the encounter. This not only improves compliance but also enhances the quality of clinical documentation for continuity of care.

Applying E&M Codes in a Wound Care Setting

Theory is one thing, but seeing E&M codes in action is where it all starts to click. Those abstract numbers and levels suddenly make sense when you connect them to the real-world clinical stories you see every day in your wound care practice. The key is to train your brain to recognize patterns of complexity and risk that align with specific code levels.

Let’s move past the definitions and walk through some concrete examples for the outpatient E&M codes you’ll use most often. We’ll focus on the office visit series: 99202-99205 for new patients and 99212-99215 for established ones. Thinking about it this way makes code selection less about memorization and more about recognizing the clinical picture right in front of you.

New Patient Scenarios in Wound Care

When a new patient walks through your door, the encounter is just naturally more involved. You’re starting from square one—building a rapport, gathering a comprehensive history, performing a detailed exam, and mapping out an initial plan of care. The E&M code you choose has to reflect that initial deep dive.

Here’s how different new patient visits might break down:

  • 99202 (Straightforward MDM): Think of a patient with a minor, uncomplicated skin tear on their forearm. The problem is simple and self-limited, you glance at minimal data (perhaps just the intake form), and the risk is low. Your plan involves basic wound care instructions and recommending an over-the-counter dressing.
  • 99203 (Low MDM): A patient is referred for a small, stable pressure ulcer on their sacrum that hasn't changed in weeks. You review their primary care notes, order a standard set of labs, and prescribe a basic topical agent. It's a chronic but stable problem with low management risk.
  • 99204 (Moderate MDM): A new patient with diabetes presents with a non-healing foot ulcer. This requires more work. You have to review extensive outside records from their PCP and endocrinologist, order an X-ray to check for osteomyelitis, and prescribe a new medication. The problem is chronic and getting worse, so the risk tied to your management plan is moderate.
  • 99205 (High MDM): A patient arrives with an acutely infected, full-thickness wound showing signs of systemic illness, such as fever and tachycardia. This is an immediate threat to the limb, or even their life. You’re reviewing critical lab values on the spot, consulting with an infectious disease specialist, and arranging for immediate hospital admission. The MDM here is clearly high due to the severe, life-threatening nature of the problem.

Established Patient Follow-Up Visits

With established patients, the story shifts to managing ongoing problems. The right code level depends on the narrative of the visit: Is the patient stable, getting worse, or showing up with a new complication? Nailing this is crucial for accurate reimbursement and avoiding compliance traps like undercoding.

Undercoding—billing for a lower level of service than you actually provided—is a huge source of lost revenue. One Florida analysis found undercoding in 9% of primary care visits. That’s 2.6 million encounters a year, adding up to $114 million in missed payments. You can learn more about how this costly issue is identified in healthcare utilization pattern studies.

Let's walk through a common scenario.

Clinical Story: A Level 4 Established Visit (99214)

Imagine an established patient, "Mr. Smith," whom you're treating for a venous leg ulcer. On his last visit, the wound was stable and granulating nicely. Today, he comes in reporting more pain. You look at the wound and see new signs of infection—erythema spreading up his leg and purulent drainage.

This completely changes the encounter. Your visit now involves:

  1. A Worsening Problem: The condition has escalated from a stable chronic issue to an acute, complicated problem. This change in the problem's status is a key factor that elevates the MDM.
  2. Complex Data Review: You have to review the lab results you ordered last week, order a new wound culture to pinpoint the pathogen, and maybe even check for a deep vein thrombosis with an ultrasound. You are actively analyzing new data to guide your treatment.
  3. Moderate Risk Management: You decide to prescribe a new oral antibiotic, which comes with its own set of risks and potential side effects. You also talk with him about needing more advanced therapies if the infection doesn't clear up and schedule an urgent one-week follow-up. This active management plan carries moderate risk.

Because the encounter involved an exacerbation of a chronic problem and a management plan with moderate risk, 99214 is the right code. It accurately tells the story of the increased clinical intensity Mr. Smith’s care demanded today. Of course, careful documentation is what holds it all together. Our guide shows how a solid wound care documentation template can help you capture these critical details every time.

Avoiding Common Coding Errors and Payer Denials

Simple mistakes in E&M coding can feel like small oversights, but they create big problems. A misplaced digit or a poorly supported note can easily trigger costly claim denials, stressful payer audits, and a real hit to your bottom line. A big part of understanding what are E&M codes is learning how to sidestep the common traps that put your reimbursement at risk.

Think of it as a defensive game. Your goal is to submit clean claims that tell a clear, accurate, and defensible story of the patient encounter. When your documentation and coding don't line up, payers see red flags. That leads to payment delays and denials that drain your practice's time and resources, forcing staff to spend hours on appeals instead of patient-facing activities.

The financial stakes are incredibly high. A landmark 2010 OIG report revealed that $6.7 billion in Medicare payments for E&M services were improper. This was largely driven by claims that were either miscoded (42%) or just didn't have enough documentation (19%), which is what prompted the stricter guidelines and intense payer scrutiny we see today. You can dig into the full findings that shaped today's stricter E&M coding environment right here.

The Biggest E&M Coding Pitfalls

To protect your revenue, you have to know what to look for. Most mistakes come from either misunderstanding the guidelines or taking documentation shortcuts that just won't hold up in an audit. These errors are often unintentional but can have serious consequences.

Here are the top offenders:

  • Upcoding: This is simply billing for a higher level of service than what you actually provided or documented. For example, billing a complex 99215 when the note only supports a straightforward 99212. Payers have sophisticated algorithms designed to spot these patterns, making this a very high-risk gamble that can lead to fraud accusations.
  • Downcoding: On the flip side, some clinicians try to play it "safe" by intentionally billing a lower-level code than what the service justifies. This is just as bad. You're leaving hard-earned money on the table, and it can still signal to payers that your practice doesn't have a firm grasp of coding principles, potentially triggering an audit.
  • Insufficient Documentation: This is, without a doubt, the most common reason for denials. Your note has to paint a complete picture of your medical decision-making or the total time spent. A note that just says "Wound healing well, continue current plan" won't support anything more than the lowest level code, if that. You must articulate the 'why' behind your decisions.

A critical mistake that invites immediate scrutiny is "note cloning" or "carrying forward" documentation. Copying and pasting huge blocks of text from a previous visit without significant, meaningful updates makes it impossible for an auditor to see what was unique about the current encounter. Each note must stand on its own as a record of that specific day's service.

Strategies for Cleaner Claims and Fewer Denials

Avoiding these errors comes down to a proactive approach built on clarity and specificity. It’s not about writing more; it’s about writing smarter. Creating a culture of documentation excellence is essential for long-term financial health.

Your documentation is the evidence that backs up your claim. If an auditor comes knocking, that note is your only defense. By adopting a few key habits, you can build audit-proof documentation that ensures you get paid correctly for the work you do. For instance, when billing for procedures alongside an E&M service, understanding how to use modifiers correctly is crucial. You can learn more by checking out our guide on what is a GP modifier to stay compliant.

Ultimately, precision is your best defense against denials. By focusing on accurate, encounter-specific documentation, you not only protect your practice's financial health but also create a more accurate and valuable medical record for patient care. This improves communication among providers and leads to better patient outcomes.

How AI Can Take the Pain Out of E&M Coding and Documentation

A doctor reviews an ECG graph on a tablet, with an 'AI Documentation' banner above.

Let's be honest, the administrative burden of E&M coding is a major drain on clinicians. It pulls you away from what you’re there to do: care for patients. The constant need to sift through dense guidelines and document every last detail just right eats up time and mental bandwidth, contributing significantly to provider burnout. But what if technology could shoulder that weight? Modern AI is finally offering a real solution, helping practices move from tedious manual work to smart, automated workflows.

Imagine a world where you can simply have a natural conversation with your patient, without constantly turning to a keyboard. That's the promise of ambient AI. These tools act like a medical scribe, listening in, filtering out the small talk, and generating a structured, clinically sound note—all in real time. The result isn't just a time-saver; it’s a more complete and accurate record of the visit itself, capturing nuances that might be missed during manual data entry.

From Conversation to a Clean Claim

The real magic happens after the note is created. The AI doesn't just stop at transcription; it analyzes the entire encounter note against the latest E&M guidelines. It weighs the complexity of the patient's problems, the data you reviewed, and the overall risk to suggest the most appropriate E&M code. This provides a data-driven recommendation, reducing subjectivity and improving consistency.

Think of it as having a compliance expert built right into your workflow. This automated analysis double-checks that your documentation fully supports the code you bill, slashing the human error and guesswork that so often lead to costly upcoding or downcoding mistakes. This creates an audit trail that links the final code directly back to the clinical narrative.

By turning natural conversation directly into structured data, AI-driven platforms can cut documentation time by up to 70%. But this isn't just about working faster—it's about submitting cleaner claims, minimizing denials, and getting paid quicker.

The financial stakes here are incredibly high, especially for specialists. In wound care settings like podiatry and vascular surgery, for instance, undercoding primary care visits alone costs Florida providers an estimated $114 million every single year. The AMA has more on how E&M codes are central to revenue cycle management and practice viability.

Building a Stronger, More Resilient Workflow

Bringing AI into your E&M process isn't just about fixing a single frustrating task. It’s about fortifying your entire clinical and financial operation. When you automate the most draining parts of documentation and coding, you free up clinicians to focus on what actually moves the needle: patient care, complex problem-solving, and building patient relationships.

AI-powered systems deliver a few key advantages:

  • Better Accuracy: AI algorithms don't have bad days. They apply E&M rules consistently, ironing out the variability and errors that creep into manual coding, leading to more predictable revenue cycles.
  • Tighter Compliance: With every code backed by solid documentation, the risk of a painful audit or a string of payer denials goes way down. The system creates a clear, defensible record for every claim.
  • Happier Providers: Less time wrestling with the EHR means less burnout and more quality, face-to-face time with patients. This can significantly improve job satisfaction and provider retention.
  • Faster Payments: Automated systems produce clean claims that sail through the billing cycle, which is a game-changer for your practice's cash flow and reduces the need for costly rework on denied claims.

Ultimately, these tools transform a time-sucking administrative chore into a smooth, data-driven process. To see how technology can make a difference, check out our guide on smart coding and billing. This shift helps your practice run more efficiently, protect its revenue, and deliver the best care possible.

E&M Coding: Your Questions Answered

Even for seasoned pros, E&M coding can throw a few curveballs. The nuances of modifiers, patient status, and telehealth can be tricky. Let's tackle some of the most common questions that come up in day-to-day practice, so you can handle these billing situations with confidence.

Can I Bill for an E&M Service and a Procedure on the Same Day?

Yes, you absolutely can, but there's a catch. The E&M service must be significant and separately identifiable from the procedure you're performing. Think of it this way: the evaluation needs to go beyond the usual prep and follow-up work that’s bundled into the procedure itself. For example, if a patient comes in for a scheduled debridement but also complains of a new, unrelated issue like chest pain that requires evaluation, that evaluation is separate.

To make it official, you’ll need to add modifier 25 to your E&M code. Your documentation is key here—it must clearly spell out why a separate evaluation was necessary that day, detailing the distinct history, exam, and medical decision-making related to that problem.

What Is the Difference Between a New and an Established Patient?

This all comes down to a simple three-year rule. A patient is considered new if they haven't received any professional services from you, or another provider of the same specialty in your practice, within the last three years. This includes any face-to-face or telehealth service.

If they have been seen by you or a colleague in your specialty group within that three-year window, they're an established patient. Getting this right is crucial because it determines which set of E&M codes you'll use for the visit. New patient codes (99202-99205) have higher reimbursement rates to account for the extra work involved in the initial intake.

How Does Telehealth Affect My Choice of E&M Codes?

Telehealth visits don't require a whole new set of codes. You'll typically use the same standard outpatient E&M codes, like 99202-99215, that you would for an in-person visit. The coding logic is the same, too—you'll select the code based on either the complexity of your Medical Decision Making (MDM) or the total time you spent on the day of the encounter.

The only real difference is the need to specify where the service happened. You'll use a Place of Service (POS) code, like POS 02 or 10, to indicate that the visit was virtual. Payers may have specific guidelines, so it's always wise to check individual policies, but the core E&M principles remain the same.

No matter how you bill, your documentation has to back it up. A strong assessment and plan that details the problems, data, and risks is your best evidence for MDM. If you're billing by time, make sure to note the total time spent and briefly describe what you did during that time. Solid documentation is your ultimate compliance tool, regardless of the setting.


At Ekagra Health AI, we turn complex clinical conversations into accurate, compliant claims in minutes. Our voice-first, AI-powered platform takes care of the documentation and suggests the right E&M code, cutting administrative busywork by up to 70%. Let us handle the paperwork so you can get back to what matters most—your patients.

Picture of Editorial Staff
Editorial Staff